Video in investigation into Nancy Guthrie's abduction raises questions about surveillance technology

Tuesday’s merchandise of video surveillance footage showing an armed, masked idiosyncratic astatine Nancy Guthrie’s doorstep connected the nighttime she was abducted has raised a big of questions astir wherefore it took truthful agelong to publically release, however it was retrieved and what it means for privacy.

The process progressive days of searching, the FBI said, aft instrumentality enforcement initially believed the footage was mislaid due to the fact that the camera was disconnected and Guthrie didn't person a subscription to the camera company.

The astonishing emergence of the video footage has resurrected questions astir integer content's agelong afterlife, arsenic billions of radical progressively entwine their lives with mishmash of internet-connected devices, making it imaginable to retrieve snapshots from their past similar aged photos stored successful an attic.

Unclear reasons for delay

In the days aft her evident abduction, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos initially said that a camera attached to Nancy Guthrie's doorway was disconnected conscionable earlier 2 a.m. connected the nighttime she disappeared. Minutes later, the camera’s bundle detected movement, but nary footage was preserved, helium said.

At the time, Nanos said that determination was nary video disposable successful portion due to the fact that Guthrie didn’t person an progressive subscription to the company. But unexpectedly, FBI Director Kash Patel said connected Tuesday that investigators kept moving for days to propulsion the videos from “residual information located successful backend systems."

It was not instantly wide wherefore it took truthful agelong to retrieve the video. The hold could, successful part, beryllium a instrumentality enforcement strategy, according to Joseph Giacalone, a retired New York constabulary sergeant who managed hundreds of homicide and missing idiosyncratic cases.

Giacalone said the FBI apt tried to softly place the idiosyncratic connected Guthrie’s structure earlier releasing the images.

“You’re trying to support these things adjacent to the vest. I deliberation they worked this space for a mates days,” Giacalone said.

Always recording

Local and national instrumentality enforcement didn't respond to questions clarifying what they meant by “disconnected" oregon who was moving connected recovering the data.

The footage appears to person travel from a Nest camera fastened connected oregon adjacent Guthrie's door. Google, which has owned Nest since 2014, is among galore companies that operates backstage surveillance cameras utilized successful and astir homes. Because communal doorbell cameras aren’t equipped with the representation cards required for immense amounts of on-device storage, the video recorded connected them is routinely transmitted to information centers scattered astir the U.S. and different countries.

Google didn’t instantly respond to questions from The Associated Press astir however the footage of the masked idiosyncratic was captured portion the camera was seemingly disconnected. They besides didn't clarify however the footage was extracted from “backend servers” adjacent though instrumentality enforcement said Guthrie didn't person a subscription.

However, Google's privateness argumentation — a papers that users often blindly hold to aft purchasing a instrumentality — makes it wide that videos tin beryllium captured erstwhile a instrumentality is offline.

“That means you whitethorn not spot a ocular indicator erstwhile your camera is sending the video footage to our servers," the argumentation states.

Data connected the unreality doesn't disappear

The argumentation besides makes wide that footage tin enactment connected unreality servers for varying amounts of time, but besides gives users the close to presumption and delete video astatine their discretion.

Unless a Nest idiosyncratic subscribes to a work that allows for speedy entree to reappraisal footage recorded connected a device, Google routinely purges the footage alternatively than clasp it indefinitely, said Stacey Higginbotham, a argumentation chap astatine Consumer Reports who specializes successful cybersecurity issues.

But if instrumentality enforcement agencies specified arsenic the FBI reached retired to Nest for the footage earlier it was overwritten, the video could inactive beryllium retrieved and watched, Higginbotham said. “It’s fundamentally similar erstwhile you nonstop an email to the trash. It’s inactive accessible,” depending connected a provider’s retention policies.

Tensions with privateness concerns

There are ostensibly ineligible guardrails that are expected to dictate however companies similar Google entree and stock footage collected connected cameras successful and astir people's homes.

Under galore idiosyncratic agreements, camera companies request a warrant oregon consent from the camera proprietor to stock footage with instrumentality enforcement, according to Michelle Dahl, the enforcement manager astatine the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project.

But determination are plentifulness of ineligible loopholes that would let a institution similar Google to stock information straight with instrumentality enforcement without either of those things, Dahl said.

“Our hearts are connected her household and what they are going through, and we are gladsome for immoderate accusation that tin pb to her being found,” she said. At the aforesaid time, Dahl added, “We should perfectly beryllium alarmed implicit the privateness implications that are astatine involvement with this video that was recovered by the Nest camera."

Dahl said she doesn't cognize astir Nest cameras specifically. But she said that immoderate idiosyncratic agreements specify that the information collected connected cameras beryllium to the camera company, not the backstage camera owner. In those cases, a institution similar Google tin stock footage with instrumentality enforcement astatine its ain discretion, without adjacent notifying its users.

Dahl, who litigates astir privateness and surveillance, said that signifier is becoming much common, making it harder for consumers to equilibrium the information a camera provides with law protections against surveillance.

“I deliberation the nationalist has gotten excessively comfy with surveillance cameras successful not lone nationalist spaces, but besides their backstage homes, without reasoning astir the consequences of wherever that information ends up,” Dahl said. “If a camera is perfectly indispensable for your security, look into options wherever that information is not transmitted disconnected to a cloud.”

___

Associated Press writer Ed White contributed reporting.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten oregon redistributed without permission.