Hopping online at the airport? Cellular may be faster than Wi-Fi - here's why

Roberto Moiola/Sysaworld/Moment via Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add america arsenic a preferred source connected Google.

ZDNET's cardinal takeaways

• Cellular entree is faster than Wi-Fi astatine astir US airports.
• A afloat 70% of US airdrome Wi-Fi networks inactive usage Wi-Fi 5.
• Run a velocity trial astatine your section airdrome to spot which is faster.

Here's a communal script for galore travelers. You're astatine an airdrome waiting for your flight. You privation to hop online with your mobile telephone to watercourse a movie, play an online game, oregon download immoderate apps. Your archetypal instinct is to link to the airport's Wi-Fi. But that whitethorn not beryllium your champion option. Have you ever tried your mobile bearer instead?

Also: Should you upgrade your Wi-Fi router to mesh? I tested it for a month, and here's my verdict

Yes, cellular could supply faster work compared with Wi-Fi, according to the latest information from Speedtest supplier Ookla. To behaviour its research, Ookla analyzed Speedtest idiosyncratic information for median download speeds astatine 50 of the apical US airports for the archetypal fractional of 2025. The investigating compared Wi-Fi sum against that of mobile carriers AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon.

The verdict? Cellular download speeds averaged astir 219.24 Mbps, portion Wi-Fi came successful astatine lone 101.39 Mbps.

Comparing the apical 3 carriers

Among the 3 large US carriers, Verizon took the apical spot with 34 airports wherever its sum was faster than Wi-Fi and 2 wherever it tied. T-Mobile's web was faster than Wi-Fi successful 32 airports. AT&T was faster successful 28 airports, including 1 tie.

The study highlighted respective examples wherever cellular bushed Wi-Fi. At Chicago's Midway, the median download velocity was 944.01 Mbps with AT&T and 122.53 Mbps with section Wi-Fi. At Sacramento International, the median download velocity was 726.19 Mbps with T-Mobile and 107.84 Mbps with Wi-Fi. And astatine Indianapolis International, the download velocity was 1,267.05 Mbps with Verizon and 51.35 Mbps with airdrome Wi-Fi.

Also: Traveling for the holidays? Consider this earlier utilizing airdrome Wi-Fi and charging ports

The results people varied by airport. Wi-Fi proved faster than cellular successful astir a 3rd of each the tests against a circumstantial mobile carrier. But compared with each 3 large mobile carriers, Wi-Fi was faster successful lone 5 airports.

At Houston's George Bush International, the median download velocity was a paltry 4.77 Mbps with AT&T and 21.36 Mbps with section Wi-Fi. At Oakland International, the median download velocity was 28.58 Mbps with T-Mobile and 194.23 Mbps with Wi-Fi. And astatine Orlando International, the download velocity was 27.35 Mbps with Verizon and 102.38 Mbps with airdrome Wi-Fi.

Here's different absorbing tidbit from the report. Network work supplier Boingo is simply a communal Wi-Fi enactment astatine galore airports, and seemingly for bully reason. Boingo-powered Wi-Fi averaged download speeds of 110.30 Mbps compared to non-Boingo airports astatine 88.38 Mbps.

Why is airdrome Wi-Fi truthful slow? 

Out of curiosity, I checked JFK, the airdrome I typically usage successful New York. Here, the results differed by carrier. The download velocity for airdrome Wi-Fi was 148.38 Mbps. The velocity for Verizon was 172.59 Mbps, the velocity for T-Mobile was 97.85 Mbps, and the velocity for AT&T was 80.17 Mbps. Cellular would beryllium the amended enactment for maine arsenic I'm a Verizon customer, but not truthful for T-Mobile and AT&T subscribers.

With Wi-Fi often touted arsenic faster than cellular access, wherefore is airdrome Wi-Fi truthful dilatory successful comparison? Ookla cited a fewer factors.

Also: I compared Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T 5G sum connected a roadworthy travel - here's who came retired connected top

  Airport Wi-Fi doesn't needfully usage the latest and top standards. In fact, 70% of the airdrome Wi-Fi connections examined by Ookla were inactive utilizing Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), which came retired successful 2013. Why don't much airports upgrade to a amended Wi-Fi version? Quite simply, the outgo and effort required to upgrade an airport's full web are overmuch greater than simply replacing a location router.

Furthermore, airports whitethorn beryllium focusing little connected sheer download speeds and much connected maintaining unchangeable connections and serving aggregate users simultaneously.

Here's the bottommost line:

Also: Get Wi-Fi anyplace you spell with this mobile hotspot 

"For the millions of passengers traveling done US airports, this investigation offers a wide strategy: Don't presume the escaped Wi-Fi is your champion option," Ookla said successful its report. 

"This isn't to denigrate Wi-Fi's performance, which successful astir airports is much than satisfactory, and again, escaped (well, ad-supported, frequently). For mobile-first travelers, already paying for unlimited data, the sunk outgo economics of downloading implicit cellular is besides free. But also, this isn't a false-choice fallacy -- some options are waiting for you to use. Run a Speedtest to spot which to select."

That past spot of proposal is worthy following. Not definite whether to prime Wi-Fi oregon cellular the adjacent clip you're astatine the airport? Head to Ookla's Speedtest page utilizing 1 and past the different to spot which is faster.